Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an essential tool in modern economic and professional activity. From automatic document drafting to predictive analysis and operational optimization, AI promises efficiency, speed, and cost reduction.
In the legal field, however, the use of AI raises essential questions regarding responsibility, compliance, and the limits within which it can\u2014or cannot\u2014replace professional legal advice.
In a European context where the regulation of emerging technologies is becoming increasingly strict, the use of AI without proper legal assessment can generate significant risks.
In our practice at Nartea & Partners, we increasingly encounter situations where clients have used AI to replace legal advice\u2014and the consequences have not been as desired.
The difference between efficiency and risk lies in how the technology is used.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What does AI mean from a legal perspective?<\/strong> When it is appropriate to use AI \u2013 and when it is not<\/strong> AI does not replace lawyers\/professionals<\/strong> Limits of using AI instead of legal advice<\/strong> The expertise of Nartea & Partners’ lawyers and insolvency practitioners in the field of AI and GDPR Conclusions<\/strong> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an essential tool in modern economic and professional activity. From automatic document drafting to predictive analysis and operational optimization, AI promises efficiency, speed, and cost reduction.In the legal field, however, the use of AI raises essential questions regarding responsibility, compliance, and the limits within which it can\u2014or cannot\u2014replace professional legal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1731"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1732,"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1731\/revisions\/1732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nartea.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
From a legal point of view, AI is not just a technological tool, but a mechanism that can produce direct legal effects.
At the European Union level, the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), adopted in 2024 by the European Parliament, introduced a risk-based framework for the use of AI systems.For high-risk AI systems (e.g., those used in recruitment, professional assessment, lending, or law enforcement), compliance obligations are strict and include audits, technical documentation, impact assessments, and transparency requirements.
At the same time, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) remains applicable, which also regulates automated decisions and profiling.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
AI can be a useful tool in everyday work if it is used as a support tool and the final analysis and responsibility remain with the professional. It is suitable in the preliminary stages, for generating indicative drafts, summarizing information, or automating repetitive and standardized activities.
However, the use of AI becomes problematic when it is involved in decisions with major legal implications: negotiating and signing complex contracts, structuring transactions, implementing internal policies affecting employees, managing litigation, or adopting measures with implications for data protection. In such situations, an in-depth legal assessment tailored to the particularities of each case is necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The legal profession involves more than the formal application of the law. It involves interpretation, strategic analysis, risk assessment, and anticipation of both legal and other long-term consequences, as well as synergistic effects.
An AI system can generate coherent text or indicate a probable legal basis. However, it cannot assess the client’s personal context, evaluate the appropriateness of a particular strategy, or support the argument in adversarial proceedings.
In addition, lawyers have professional obligations of confidentiality, loyalty, and independence, as well as clearly regulated liability. These elements are essential guarantees for the client and cannot be replicated by a technological tool.
Why it is not a good idea to use AI instead of legal advice<\/strong>
Replacing legal advice with AI means reducing a complex analysis to an automated result. Such an approach can lead to contractual clauses that are not adapted to the specific situation, incomplete interpretations of the law, or the disregard of risks specific to the field of activity.
Furthermore, in the context of the adoption of the AI Act by the European Parliament, the use of certain AI systems is subject to strict compliance obligations. Failure to conduct a legal assessment of the system’s classification in a particular risk category may result in significant penalties and restrictions. Legal advice does not just provide an answer, but a tailored, well-founded, and professionally sound solution. The difference between an automatically generated text and a professional legal opinion lies in the integrated analysis of all legal and commercial implications.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The main limitation of AI is the absence of legal discernment. Law is a dynamic field, influenced by case law, administrative practice, and legislative developments. A solution that is theoretically correct may become inappropriate in relation to the orientation of the courts or competent authorities.
Furthermore, AI cannot realistically assess the reputational risk or impact of a decision on commercial relationships. In the business environment, these elements are often as important as strictly normative analysis.
Therefore, AI should be viewed as an auxiliary tool, not a substitute for legal advice.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>At Nartea & Partners,<\/strong> we approach the use of AI from an integrated legal perspective. We assist companies in assessing the compliance of AI systems, analyzing the associated risks, and implementing the requirements imposed by the European regulatory framework. At the same time, we have consolidated expertise in the field of data protection and the application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). We offer compliance audit services, data protection impact assessments, drafting of internal policies, and assistance in relations with supervisory authorities.
In the context of AI use, GDPR analysis is not a secondary element, but an essential component of legal strategy. Our goal is to prevent risks and ensure the integration of technology into a secure and sustainable legal framework.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Artificial intelligence is a major technological advance and a valuable tool for streamlining legal and corporate activities. Used correctly, it can bring real benefits and optimize internal processes.
However, AI cannot replace professional legal advice in situations involving complex interpretation, liability, and strategic risk assessment. Choosing to replace legal analysis with an automated tool can have significant legal and financial consequences, posing a real risk.
In an ever-changing regulatory environment, the use of AI must be accompanied by rigorous legal analysis. The Nartea & Partners<\/strong> team offers the expertise needed to turn technology into a real competitive advantage, while maintaining the security and legal compliance of your business. (www.nartea.ro)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n